Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Amazon Athena vs Azure Cosmos DB: What are the differences?
Introduction: In this comparison, we will explore the key differences between Amazon Athena and Azure Cosmos DB.
Querying and Data Types: Amazon Athena is used for running SQL queries on data stored in S3, making it suitable for structured and semi-structured data. Azure Cosmos DB, on the other hand, is a globally distributed database service that supports multiple data models such as key-value, document, and graph, allowing for more flexibility in data types and structures.
Database Architecture: Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that executes queries directly on data stored in S3 without the need for infrastructure management. In contrast, Azure Cosmos DB is a fully managed NoSQL database service that provides automatic scaling, high availability, and low latency access to data globally, making it suitable for mission-critical applications with varied workloads.
Consistency Models: Amazon Athena does not offer consistency models as it is primarily a query service for analyzing data. Azure Cosmos DB, however, supports multiple consistency levels including strong, bounded staleness, session, consistent prefix, and eventual consistency, allowing users to choose the level that best fits their application requirements.
Scalability and Pricing: Amazon Athena pricing is based on the amount of data scanned by queries, making it cost-effective for occasional or sporadic usage. Azure Cosmos DB, on the other hand, offers flexible pricing options based on throughput, storage, and the number of regions, enabling users to scale up or down based on their performance and cost needs.
Integration and Ecosystem: Amazon Athena integrates seamlessly with other AWS services such as Glue for data cataloging and QuickSight for visualization, leveraging the broader AWS ecosystem for data analytics. In comparison, Azure Cosmos DB can be integrated with various Azure services like Azure Functions, Logic Apps, and Power BI, providing a comprehensive platform for building modern cloud-native applications.
Consistency in Query Performance: While Amazon Athena might experience slower query performance when dealing with large datasets due to its on-demand nature, Azure Cosmos DB ensures consistent low latency and high throughput for read and write operations across globally distributed data with guaranteed SLAs.
In Summary, Amazon Athena is more suited for ad-hoc querying of structured and semi-structured data in S3, while Azure Cosmos DB provides a globally distributed, multi-model database service with flexible data types, consistency models, scalability options, and deeper integration with Azure services for modern cloud-native applications.
Hi all,
Currently, we need to ingest the data from Amazon S3 to DB either Amazon Athena or Amazon Redshift. But the problem with the data is, it is in .PSV (pipe separated values) format and the size is also above 200 GB. The query performance of the timeout in Athena/Redshift is not up to the mark, too slow while compared to Google BigQuery. How would I optimize the performance and query result time? Can anyone please help me out?
you can use aws glue service to convert you pipe format data to parquet format , and thus you can achieve data compression . Now you should choose Redshift to copy your data as it is very huge. To manage your data, you should partition your data in S3 bucket and also divide your data across the redshift cluster
First of all you should make your choice upon Redshift or Athena based on your use case since they are two very diferent services - Redshift is an enterprise-grade MPP Data Warehouse while Athena is a SQL layer on top of S3 with limited performance. If performance is a key factor, users are going to execute unpredictable queries and direct and managing costs are not a problem I'd definitely go for Redshift. If performance is not so critical and queries will be predictable somewhat I'd go for Athena.
Once you select the technology you'll need to optimize your data in order to get the queries executed as fast as possible. In both cases you may need to adapt the data model to fit your queries better. In the case you go for Athena you'd also proabably need to change your file format to Parquet or Avro and review your partition strategy depending on your most frequent type of query. If you choose Redshift you'll need to ingest the data from your files into it and maybe carry out some tuning tasks for performance gain.
I'll recommend Redshift for now since it can address a wider range of use cases, but we could give you better advice if you described your use case in depth.
It depend of the nature of your data (structured or not?) and of course your queries (ad-hoc or predictible?). For example you can look at partitioning and columnar format to maximize MPP capabilities for both Athena and Redshift
you can change your PSV fomat data to parquet file format with AWS GLUE and then your query performance will be improved
Pros of Amazon Athena
- Use SQL to analyze CSV files16
- Glue crawlers gives easy Data catalogue8
- Cheap7
- Query all my data without running servers 24x76
- No data base servers yay4
- Easy integration with QuickSight3
- Query and analyse CSV,parquet,json files in sql2
- Also glue and athena use same data catalog2
- No configuration required1
- Ad hoc checks on data made easy0
Pros of Azure Cosmos DB
- Best-of-breed NoSQL features28
- High scalability22
- Globally distributed15
- Automatic indexing over flexible json data model14
- Tunable consistency10
- Always on with 99.99% availability sla10
- Javascript language integrated transactions and queries7
- Predictable performance6
- High performance5
- Analytics Store5
- Rapid Development2
- No Sql2
- Auto Indexing2
- Ease of use2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Amazon Athena
Cons of Azure Cosmos DB
- Pricing18
- Poor No SQL query support4