Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
AWS CodeDeploy vs Ansible: What are the differences?
Key Differences between AWS CodeDeploy and Ansible
Deployment Process: AWS CodeDeploy automates the application deployment process by deploying code to multiple servers simultaneously, ensuring seamless updates without downtime. On the other hand, Ansible is a powerful open-source automation tool that deploys and manages applications using a declarative language, allowing for more flexibility and customizability in the deployment process.
Platform Support: AWS CodeDeploy is specifically designed for deploying applications on Amazon Web Services (AWS) infrastructure and offers native integrations with other AWS services. In contrast, Ansible provides a platform-agnostic solution, allowing deployment to a wide range of target systems, including both cloud and on-premises environments.
Agent Requirement: AWS CodeDeploy requires the installation of an agent on each target instance to facilitate deployment and orchestration. This agent communicates with the AWS CodeDeploy service to coordinate the deployment process. In contrast, Ansible operates agentlessly, leveraging SSH connections or other remote management protocols to execute tasks on target systems, eliminating the need for installing any additional software.
Scalability: AWS CodeDeploy is specifically designed to handle large-scale deployments, allowing easy management of fleets of instances. It provides features like deployment groups and lifecycle hooks to orchestrate deployments across multiple instances. Ansible, on the other hand, can also handle large deployments efficiently but may require additional configuration and optimization to achieve the same level of scalability as CodeDeploy.
Integration with CI/CD Pipelines: AWS CodeDeploy seamlessly integrates with AWS CodePipeline, enabling a fully automated continuous integration and deployment pipeline. It supports integration with other AWS services like AWS CodeCommit and AWS CodeBuild for end-to-end automation. Ansible can also integrate with CI/CD pipelines but requires additional configuration and setup using tools like Jenkins or GitLab.
Configuration Management: While both AWS CodeDeploy and Ansible handle application deployment, Ansible also includes powerful configuration management capabilities. Ansible allows for managing the desired state configuration of systems, making it an ideal choice for automating infrastructure provisioning and maintaining consistent system configurations alongside application deployment.
In Summary, AWS CodeDeploy streamlines application deployment on AWS infrastructure with native integration and efficient management of deployments, whereas Ansible offers a platform-agnostic and flexible approach with additional configuration management capabilities.
I'm just getting started using Vagrant to help automate setting up local VMs to set up a Kubernetes cluster (development and experimentation only). (Yes, I do know about minikube)
I'm looking for a tool to help install software packages, setup users, etc..., on these VMs. I'm also fairly new to Ansible, Chef, and Puppet. What's a good one to start with to learn? I might decide to try all 3 at some point for my own curiosity.
The most important factors for me are simplicity, ease of use, shortest learning curve.
I have been working with Puppet and Ansible. The reason why I prefer ansible is the distribution of it. Ansible is more lightweight and therefore more popular. This leads to situations, where you can get fully packaged applications for ansible (e.g. confluent) supported by the vendor, but only incomplete packages for Puppet.
The only advantage I would see with Puppet if someone wants to use Foreman. This is still better supported with Puppet.
If you are just starting out, might as well learn Kubernetes There's a lot of tools that come with Kube that make it easier to use and most importantly: you become cloud-agnostic. We use Ansible because it's a lot simpler than Chef or Puppet and if you use Docker Compose for your deployments you can re-use them with Kubernetes later when you migrate
Pros of Ansible
- Agentless284
- Great configuration210
- Simple199
- Powerful176
- Easy to learn155
- Flexible69
- Doesn't get in the way of getting s--- done55
- Makes sense35
- Super efficient and flexible30
- Powerful27
- Dynamic Inventory11
- Backed by Red Hat9
- Works with AWS7
- Cloud Oriented6
- Easy to maintain6
- Vagrant provisioner4
- Simple and powerful4
- Multi language4
- Simple4
- Because SSH4
- Procedural or declarative, or both4
- Easy4
- Consistency3
- Well-documented2
- Masterless2
- Debugging is simple2
- Merge hash to get final configuration similar to hiera2
- Fast as hell2
- Manage any OS1
- Work on windows, but difficult to manage1
- Certified Content1
Pros of AWS CodeDeploy
- Automates code deployments17
- Backed by Amazon9
- Adds autoscaling lifecycle hooks7
- Git integration5
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Ansible
- Dangerous8
- Hard to install5
- Doesn't Run on Windows3
- Bloated3
- Backward compatibility3
- No immutable infrastructure2