Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
Apache Ant vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?
Apache Ant and Bitbucket are two widely used tools in the world of software development. Below are the key differences between Apache Ant and Bitbucket:
1. **Build automation tool vs. Version control system**: Apache Ant is primarily a build automation tool used for compiling, assembling, testing, and deploying software projects, while Bitbucket is a version control system that helps teams collaborate on code development and manage changes to the codebase.
2. **Syntax and Purpose**: The syntax of Apache Ant scripts is XML-based, focusing on build tasks and dependencies, while Bitbucket operates with Git commands for version control, enabling teams to track changes, create branches, and merge code efficiently.
3. **Local vs. Remote Repository**: With Apache Ant, build files are stored locally within the project directory to manage the build process, while Bitbucket utilizes a remote repository hosted on servers, allowing team members to access and work on the same codebase from different locations.
4. **Task Execution**: Apache Ant follows a sequential execution approach where tasks are executed in the order specified in the build script, whereas in Bitbucket, tasks like merging branches or resolving conflicts can be performed concurrently by team members working on the same project.
5. **Integration with other tools**: Apache Ant integrates well with various IDEs and continuous integration tools for automated builds and testing, while Bitbucket offers seamless integration with other Atlassian products like Jira and Confluence for enhanced project management and collaboration capabilities.
In Summary, Apache Ant primarily focuses on build automation tasks using XML-based scripts, while Bitbucket is designed as a robust version control system optimized for code collaboration and management within development teams.
Decisions about Apache Ant and Bitbucket
Weverton Timoteo
CTO at SourceLevel · | 14 upvotes · 1.1M views
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
Weverton Timoteo
CTO at SourceLevel · | 9 upvotes · 982.4K views
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of Apache Ant
Pros of Bitbucket
Pros of Apache Ant
- Flexible4
- Simple1
- Easy to learn1
- Easy to write own java-build-hooks1
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Apache Ant
Cons of Bitbucket
Cons of Apache Ant
- Slow1
- Old and not widely used anymore1
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
- No public GitHub repository available -
What is Apache Ant?
Ant is a Java-based build tool. In theory, it is kind of like Make, without Make's wrinkles and with the full portability of pure Java code.
What is Bitbucket?
Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
What companies use Apache Ant?
What companies use Bitbucket?
What companies use Apache Ant?
See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Ant or Bitbucket.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Apache Ant?
What tools integrate with Bitbucket?
What tools integrate with Apache Ant?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+4 3
1071
+32 17
5984
+34 29
42476
What are some alternatives to Apache Ant and Bitbucket?
Eclipse
Standard Eclipse package suited for Java and plug-in development plus adding new plugins; already includes Git, Marketplace Client, source code and developer documentation.
Click here to file a bug against Eclipse Platform.
Gradle
Gradle is a build tool with a focus on build automation and support for multi-language development. If you are building, testing, publishing, and deploying software on any platform, Gradle offers a flexible model that can support the entire development lifecycle from compiling and packaging code to publishing web sites.
Apache Maven
Maven allows a project to build using its project object model (POM) and a set of plugins that are shared by all projects using Maven, providing a uniform build system. Once you familiarize yourself with how one Maven project builds you automatically know how all Maven projects build saving you immense amounts of time when trying to navigate many projects.
Apache Tomcat
Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.
Jenkins
In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.