Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Apache Maven vs Bitbucket: What are the differences?
Introduction
Apache Maven and Bitbucket are popular tools used in the software development process. While they serve different purposes, both tools play a crucial role in enhancing collaboration and efficiency. In this comparison, we will highlight the key differences between Apache Maven and Bitbucket.
Dependency Management: Apache Maven primarily focuses on managing project dependencies. It provides a centralized repository to retrieve and manage various libraries and dependencies required for a project. On the other hand, Bitbucket is a version control system that allows developers to store, manage, and collaborate on source code. Although Bitbucket supports some dependency management features, it is not the primary focus of this tool.
Build Automation: Maven is known for its strong build automation capabilities. It uses a declarative XML-based configuration called "pom.xml" to define the build process, including compiling, packaging, and deploying the projects. Bitbucket, on the other hand, doesn't provide built-in build automation features like Maven. However, it can be integrated with other build automation tools like Jenkins to achieve similar functionalities.
Continuous Integration/Deployment: Maven integrates well with Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Deployment (CD) pipelines. It can be seamlessly integrated with popular CI/CD tools like Jenkins to automate the build, testing, and deployment processes. Bitbucket also supports CI/CD pipelines through its built-in feature called "Bitbucket Pipelines." This feature allows developers to define workflows and automate the building, testing, and deploying of code changes.
Version Control: Bitbucket is primarily a version control system (VCS) that supports distributed version control, specifically Git. It provides features like code collaboration, code branching, version tracking, and pull requests. On the other hand, while Maven does not provide built-in version control features, it can integrate with VCS tools like Git or Subversion for version control.
Project Management: Maven offers project management features through the pom.xml file. It allows developers to define the project structure, dependencies, and various configurations. Bitbucket, on the other hand, offers basic project management capabilities like issue tracking, task management, and project boards. It provides a convenient way to track and manage project-related tasks and issues.
Community and Ecosystem: Apache Maven has a large and active community, with a wide range of plugins and extensions available for different purposes. This vast ecosystem makes it easier for developers to find solutions and leverage existing functionalities. Bitbucket, on the other hand, has a smaller but growing community. While it might have a fewer number of plugins and extensions compared to Maven, it still offers a decent range of integrations and extensions.
In summary, Apache Maven focuses on dependency management, build automation, and integration with CI/CD tools, while Bitbucket primarily serves as a version control system with added project management features. Maven has a larger community and ecosystem, while Bitbucket has a growing community. Both tools play a crucial role in enhancing collaboration and efficiency in software development projects.
Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?
If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:
- Pick the correct target branch
- Make Drafts explicit
- Name things properly
- Ask help for tools
- Remove the noise
- Fetch necessary data
- Understand Mergeability
- Pass the message
- Add screenshots
- Be found in the future
- Comment inline in your changes
Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D
What else do you review before asking for code review?
One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i
is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.
It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.
Pros of Bitbucket
- Free private repos904
- Simple setup397
- Nice ui and tools348
- Unlimited private repositories341
- Affordable git hosting240
- Integrates with many apis and services123
- Reliable uptime119
- Nice gui87
- Pull requests and code reviews85
- Very customisable58
- Mercurial repositories16
- SourceTree integration14
- JIRA integration12
- Track every commit to an issue in JIRA10
- Deployment hooks8
- Best free alternative to Github8
- Automatically share repositories with all your teammates7
- Compatible with Mac and Windows7
- Source Code Insight6
- Price6
- Login with Google5
- Create a wiki5
- Approve pull request button5
- Customizable pipelines4
- #2 Atlassian Product after JIRA4
- Also supports Mercurial3
- Unlimited Private Repos at no cost3
- Continuous Integration and Delivery3
- Academic license program2
- Multilingual interface2
- Teamcity2
- Open source friendly2
- Issues tracker2
- IAM2
- IAM integration2
- Mercurial Support2
Pros of Apache Maven
- Dependency management138
- Necessary evil70
- I’d rather code my app, not my build60
- Publishing packaged artifacts48
- Convention over configuration43
- Modularisation18
- Consistency across builds11
- Prevents overengineering using scripting6
- Runs Tests4
- Lot of cool plugins4
- Extensible3
- Hard to customize2
- Runs on Linux2
- Runs on OS X1
- Slow incremental build1
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Undeterminisc1
- Good IDE tooling1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Bitbucket
- Not much community activity19
- Difficult to review prs because of confusing ui17
- Quite buggy15
- Managed by enterprise Java company10
- CI tool is not free of charge8
- Complexity with rights management7
- Only 5 collaborators for private repos6
- Slow performance4
- No AWS Codepipelines integration2
- No more Mercurial repositories1
- No server side git-hook support1
Cons of Apache Maven
- Complex6
- Inconsistent buillds1
- Not many plugin-alternatives0