Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CasperJS

65
120
+ 1
0
Selenium

15.4K
12.3K
+ 1
525
Add tool

CasperJS vs Selenium: What are the differences?

Introduction:

CasperJS and Selenium are both popular tools used for web automation testing. While they serve a similar purpose, there are significant differences between the two that can influence the choice of tool for a particular project.

  1. Language Support: CasperJS is primarily based on JavaScript and PhantomJS, while Selenium supports multiple languages such as Java, Python, Ruby, and C#. This difference allows developers to choose their preferred language for writing test scripts, making Selenium more versatile in terms of language support.

  2. Testing Capabilities: Selenium is known for its extensive testing capabilities, offering support for different types of testing such as functional, regression, and performance testing. On the other hand, CasperJS is more focused on high-level testing and user interactions, making it suitable for scenarios where simulating user behaviors is crucial.

  3. Browser Support: Selenium supports a wide range of browsers including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Internet Explorer, making it a versatile choice for cross-browser testing. CasperJS, on the other hand, is more limited in terms of browser support and is primarily focused on PhantomJS, which may restrict its applicability in certain testing scenarios.

  4. Community and Documentation: Selenium has a larger and more active community compared to CasperJS, resulting in better support, resources, and documentation available for users. This extensive community support can be advantageous when encountering issues or seeking help during test automation projects.

  5. Execution Speed: CasperJS is known for its faster execution speed compared to Selenium in certain scenarios, particularly due to its lightweight nature and the use of PhantomJS as the headless browser. This difference in execution speed can be a crucial factor when considering the performance of test automation scripts.

  6. Ease of Use: CasperJS is often praised for its simplicity and ease of use, making it a preferred choice for beginners or developers looking for a quick setup. In contrast, Selenium, with its more comprehensive features and capabilities, may have a steeper learning curve for users who are new to test automation.

In Summary, the key differences between CasperJS and Selenium lie in their language support, testing capabilities, browser support, community and documentation, execution speed, and ease of use, all of which can impact the choice of tool for a web automation testing project.

Advice on CasperJS and Selenium
Needs advice
on
JestJestSeleniumSelenium
and
WebdriverIOWebdriverIO
in

we are having one web application developed in Reacts.js. in the application, we have only 4 to 5 pages that we need to test. I am having experience in selenium with java. Please suggets which tool I should use. and why ............................ ............................ .............................

See more
Replies (1)
Prashanth Marappa
Senior Software Engineer at Mphasis · | 1 upvotes · 218.2K views
Recommends
on
SeleniumSelenium

with the help of selenium we can automate react js for functional testing

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CasperJS
Pros of Selenium
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 175
      Automates browsers
    • 154
      Testing
    • 101
      Essential tool for running test automation
    • 24
      Record-Playback
    • 24
      Remote Control
    • 8
      Data crawling
    • 7
      Supports end to end testing
    • 6
      Easy set up
    • 6
      Functional testing
    • 4
      The Most flexible monitoring system
    • 3
      End to End Testing
    • 3
      Easy to integrate with build tools
    • 2
      Comparing the performance selenium is faster than jasm
    • 2
      Record and playback
    • 2
      Compatible with Python
    • 2
      Easy to scale
    • 2
      Integration Tests
    • 0
      Integrated into Selenium-Jupiter framework

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of CasperJS
    Cons of Selenium
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 8
        Flaky tests
      • 4
        Slow as needs to make browser (even with no gui)
      • 2
        Update browser drivers

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is CasperJS?

      CasperJS is a browser navigation scripting & testing utility written in Javascript for PhantomJS or SlimerJS.

      What is Selenium?

      Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention CasperJS and Selenium as a desired skillset
      What companies use CasperJS?
      What companies use Selenium?
      See which teams inside your own company are using CasperJS or Selenium.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with CasperJS?
      What tools integrate with Selenium?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to CasperJS and Selenium?
      PhantomJS
      PhantomJS is a headless WebKit scriptable with JavaScript. It is used by hundreds of developers and dozens of organizations for web-related development workflow.
      Puppeteer
      Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome over the DevTools Protocol. It can also be configured to use full (non-headless) Chrome.
      Cypress
      Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
      SlimerJS
      It allows you to manipulate a web page with an external Javascript script: opening a webpage, clicking on links, modifying the content... It is useful to do functional tests, page automation, network monitoring, screen capture etc.
      Protractor
      Protractor is an end-to-end test framework for Angular and AngularJS applications. Protractor runs tests against your application running in a real browser, interacting with it as a user would.
      See all alternatives