Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

CodeStream

28
33
+ 1
3
Terraform

18K
14.2K
+ 1
345
Add tool

CodeStream vs Terraform: What are the differences?

  1. Key difference 1: Integration with development tools: CodeStream is a code collaboration and knowledge-sharing platform that integrates with popular code editors like Visual Studio Code, Atom, and JetBrains IDEs. It provides seamless integrations and in-editor experiences for code reviews, comments, and discussions. On the other hand, Terraform is an open-source infrastructure as code software tool that allows users to define and provision infrastructure resources using declarative configuration files. It integrates with various cloud providers and deployment tools, enabling infrastructure orchestration and automation.
  2. Key difference 2: Scope of usage: CodeStream is primarily focused on enhancing the coding experience by providing tools for code review, knowledge sharing, and collaboration within an integrated development environment (IDE). It enables developers to discuss code in-line, capture feedback, and share code snippets more efficiently. In contrast, Terraform is specifically designed for managing infrastructure as code, allowing users to define, provision, and maintain cloud infrastructure resources such as virtual machines, networks, storage, and services.
  3. Key difference 3: Programming languages supported: CodeStream supports a wide range of programming languages since its main purpose is to facilitate code collaboration and discussion within an IDE. It provides language-specific features like code reviewing and commenting for various languages like JavaScript, Python, Java, C++, and more. On the contrary, Terraform is language-agnostic and can be used to provision infrastructure resources on any supported cloud provider, irrespective of the programming language used to develop the application.
  4. Key difference 4: Level of abstraction: CodeStream operates at a higher level of abstraction, focusing on the code review and collaboration aspects of software development. It provides real-time collaboration features, like code commenting and discussions, directly within the IDE. In contrast, Terraform operates at a lower level of abstraction, allowing users to define infrastructure resources and their configurations using declarative syntax, which is then translated into the specific cloud provider's API calls.
  5. Key difference 5: Complexity: CodeStream is designed to simplify the code review and collaboration process by providing a user-friendly interface and integrated functionalities within the IDE. It aims to reduce the complexity of coordinating and managing feedback and discussions related to code changes. Conversely, Terraform can involve more complexity due to the need to define and manage infrastructure resources, dependencies, and their configurations using Terraform-specific language constructs and modules.
  6. Key difference 6: Target audience: CodeStream is primarily targeted towards software development teams and organizations that prioritize collaboration, knowledge sharing, and code review processes as part of their development workflow. It is especially useful for teams working on complex projects or distributed teams that require effective code discussion and collaboration. In contrast, Terraform caters to infrastructure engineers, DevOps teams, and cloud architects who are responsible for managing and provisioning infrastructure resources, automating deployment processes, and maintaining infrastructure-as-code practices.

In summary, CodeStream focuses on enhancing code collaboration and knowledge sharing within an IDE, while Terraform is geared towards infrastructure management and provisioning using declarative configuration files, catering to different needs and target audiences in software development and infrastructure domains.

Decisions about CodeStream and Terraform

Because Pulumi uses real programming languages, you can actually write abstractions for your infrastructure code, which is incredibly empowering. You still 'describe' your desired state, but by having a programming language at your fingers, you can factor out patterns, and package it up for easier consumption.

See more
Sergey Ivanov
Overview

We use Terraform to manage AWS cloud environment for the project. It is pretty complex, largely static, security-focused, and constantly evolving.

Terraform provides descriptive (declarative) way of defining the target configuration, where it can work out the dependencies between configuration elements and apply differences without re-provisioning the entire cloud stack.

Advantages

Terraform is vendor-neutral in a way that it is using a common configuration language (HCL) with plugins (providers) for multiple cloud and service providers.

Terraform keeps track of the previous state of the deployment and applies incremental changes, resulting in faster deployment times.

Terraform allows us to share reusable modules between projects. We have built an impressive library of modules internally, which makes it very easy to assemble a new project from pre-fabricated building blocks.

Disadvantages

Software is imperfect, and Terraform is no exception. Occasionally we hit annoying bugs that we have to work around. The interaction with any underlying APIs is encapsulated inside 3rd party Terraform providers, and any bug fixes or new features require a provider release. Some providers have very poor coverage of the underlying APIs.

Terraform is not great for managing highly dynamic parts of cloud environments. That part is better delegated to other tools or scripts.

Terraform state may go out of sync with the target environment or with the source configuration, which often results in painful reconciliation.

See more

I personally am not a huge fan of vendor lock in for multiple reasons:

  • I've seen cost saving moves to the cloud end up costing a fortune and trapping companies due to over utilization of cloud specific features.
  • I've seen S3 failures nearly take down half the internet.
  • I've seen companies get stuck in the cloud because they aren't built cloud agnostic.

I choose to use terraform for my cloud provisioning for these reasons:

  • It's cloud agnostic so I can use it no matter where I am.
  • It isn't difficult to use and uses a relatively easy to read language.
  • It tests infrastructure before running it, and enables me to see and keep changes up to date.
  • It runs from the same CLI I do most of my CM work from.
See more

Context: I wanted to create an end to end IoT data pipeline simulation in Google Cloud IoT Core and other GCP services. I never touched Terraform meaningfully until working on this project, and it's one of the best explorations in my development career. The documentation and syntax is incredibly human-readable and friendly. I'm used to building infrastructure through the google apis via Python , but I'm so glad past Sung did not make that decision. I was tempted to use Google Cloud Deployment Manager, but the templates were a bit convoluted by first impression. I'm glad past Sung did not make this decision either.

Solution: Leveraging Google Cloud Build Google Cloud Run Google Cloud Bigtable Google BigQuery Google Cloud Storage Google Compute Engine along with some other fun tools, I can deploy over 40 GCP resources using Terraform!

Check Out My Architecture: CLICK ME

Check out the GitHub repo attached

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of CodeStream
Pros of Terraform
  • 3
    Integrates with everything
  • 122
    Infrastructure as code
  • 73
    Declarative syntax
  • 45
    Planning
  • 28
    Simple
  • 24
    Parallelism
  • 8
    Well-documented
  • 8
    Cloud agnostic
  • 6
    It's like coding your infrastructure in simple English
  • 6
    Immutable infrastructure
  • 5
    Platform agnostic
  • 4
    Extendable
  • 4
    Automation
  • 4
    Automates infrastructure deployments
  • 4
    Portability
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Scales to hundreds of hosts

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of CodeStream
Cons of Terraform
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Doesn't have full support to GKE

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is CodeStream?

    CodeStream helps development teams resolve issues faster, and improve code quality by streamlining code reviews inside your IDE. CodeStream enables asynchronous communication among developers on your team, anywhere.

    What is Terraform?

    With Terraform, you describe your complete infrastructure as code, even as it spans multiple service providers. Your servers may come from AWS, your DNS may come from CloudFlare, and your database may come from Heroku. Terraform will build all these resources across all these providers in parallel.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use CodeStream?
    What companies use Terraform?
    See which teams inside your own company are using CodeStream or Terraform.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with CodeStream?
    What tools integrate with Terraform?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    GitHubGitPython+22
    17
    14219
    JavaScriptGitHubPython+42
    53
    21908
    What are some alternatives to CodeStream and Terraform?
    GitLab
    GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.
    Jenkins
    In a nutshell Jenkins CI is the leading open-source continuous integration server. Built with Java, it provides over 300 plugins to support building and testing virtually any project.
    JavaScript
    JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
    Git
    Git is a free and open source distributed version control system designed to handle everything from small to very large projects with speed and efficiency.
    GitHub
    GitHub is the best place to share code with friends, co-workers, classmates, and complete strangers. Over three million people use GitHub to build amazing things together.
    See all alternatives