Continually vs Errbot: What are the differences?

1. Integration Capabilities: Continually offers seamless integration with popular tools such as Slack, Zendesk, and Zapier, making it easy to incorporate into existing workflows. On the other hand, Errbot allows for extensibility through its plugin system, enabling users to customize and add functionality as needed.

2. Focused Use Cases: Continually is primarily designed for managing conversational workflows, providing solutions for chatbots, lead generation, and customer support. In contrast, Errbot is tailored towards building chatbots, automation, and managing interactions within chat platforms like Slack and HipChat.

3. Deployment Options: Continually offers a cloud-based solution, allowing users to quickly set up and start using the platform without any installation requirements. Meanwhile, Errbot can be deployed on-premises or in a private cloud, giving users more control over their data and security.

4. User Interface: Continually provides a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop functionality for creating chatbot workflows, making it accessible to users with varying technical skills. Errbot, being a bot development framework, requires a certain level of technical proficiency to set up and customize the bot to specific requirements.

5. Support and Documentation: Continually provides comprehensive documentation and support resources, including tutorials, FAQs, and live chat assistance to help users navigate the platform effectively. In contrast, Errbot has an active community and network of developers who contribute to its documentation and offer support through forums and chat channels.

6. Cost Structure: Continually offers subscription-based pricing plans tailored to different business needs, with a free trial option available for users to test the platform. Errbot, being open-source, is free to use but may incur costs for additional plugins, hosting, and maintenance depending on the deployment method chosen.

In Summary, Continually and Errbot differ in integration capabilities, focused use cases, deployment options, user interface, support and documentation, and cost structure.