Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Datadog vs Pingdom: What are the differences?
Datadog vs Pingdom
Introduction:
Datadog and Pingdom are both popular monitoring tools used by organizations to track and analyze the performance of their applications and infrastructure. While they share some similarities, there are key differences between the two that set them apart.
Monitoring Capabilities: Datadog offers a comprehensive set of monitoring capabilities, including metrics, traces, logs, and user experience monitoring. It provides a unified view of your entire infrastructure, allowing you to monitor application performance, identify bottlenecks, and troubleshoot issues efficiently. In contrast, Pingdom primarily focuses on website monitoring, offering uptime monitoring, page speed monitoring, and transaction monitoring.
Platform Coverage: Datadog supports a wide range of platforms, including cloud, on-premises, and hybrid environments. It has extensive integrations with popular cloud providers and technologies, enabling you to monitor your entire stack regardless of where it is hosted. Pingdom, on the other hand, is primarily cloud-based and focuses mainly on monitoring websites and web applications.
Customization and Alerting: Datadog provides powerful customization options, allowing you to create tailored dashboards, alerts, and visualizations. You can define complex alert conditions, set up alert thresholds, and customize notification channels. Pingdom, on the other hand, offers more simplified customization options, primarily focusing on standard alerting based on thresholds.
Scalability and Performance: Datadog is built for large-scale environments and can handle high volumes of metrics and data points. It is designed to scale horizontally, ensuring that it can handle the monitoring needs of even the most demanding infrastructures. Pingdom, while capable of monitoring multiple websites, may face limitations in scalability and performance when dealing with large-scale applications and complex architectures.
Ease of Use: Datadog provides a user-friendly interface with an intuitive navigation system, making it easy to set up and configure monitoring. It offers comprehensive documentation and a vast knowledge base to assist users in getting started and utilizing the platform's capabilities effectively. Pingdom also provides a user-friendly interface, but its focus on website monitoring leads to a more simplified setup process.
Additional Features: Datadog offers additional features such as APM (Application Performance Monitoring), network monitoring, anomaly detection, and integrations with popular DevOps tools. Pingdom, on the other hand, has a strong emphasis on features specific to website monitoring, such as transaction monitoring and real user monitoring (RUM).
**In Summary, Datadog offers a more comprehensive monitoring solution with a broader range of capabilities, scalability, and customization options, while Pingdom specializes in website monitoring with a user-friendly interface and simplified setup process.
Hey there! We are looking at Datadog, Dynatrace, AppDynamics, and New Relic as options for our web application monitoring.
Current Environment: .NET Core Web app hosted on Microsoft IIS
Future Environment: Web app will be hosted on Microsoft Azure
Tech Stacks: IIS, RabbitMQ, Redis, Microsoft SQL Server
Requirement: Infra Monitoring, APM, Real - User Monitoring (User activity monitoring i.e., time spent on a page, most active page, etc.), Service Tracing, Root Cause Analysis, and Centralized Log Management.
Please advise on the above. Thanks!
We are looking for a centralised monitoring solution for our application deployed on Amazon EKS. We would like to monitor using metrics from Kubernetes, AWS services (NeptuneDB, AWS Elastic Load Balancing (ELB), Amazon EBS, Amazon S3, etc) and application microservice's custom metrics.
We are expected to use around 80 microservices (not replicas). I think a total of 200-250 microservices will be there in the system with 10-12 slave nodes.
We tried Prometheus but it looks like maintenance is a big issue. We need to manage scaling, maintaining the storage, and dealing with multiple exporters and Grafana. I felt this itself needs few dedicated resources (at least 2-3 people) to manage. Not sure if I am thinking in the correct direction. Please confirm.
You mentioned Datadog and Sysdig charges per host. Does it charge per slave node?
Can't say anything to Sysdig. I clearly prefer Datadog as
- they provide plenty of easy to "switch-on" plugins for various technologies (incl. most of AWS)
- easy to code (python) agent plugins / api for own metrics
- brillant dashboarding / alarms with many customization options
- pricing is OK, there are cheaper options for specific use cases but if you want superior dashboarding / alarms I haven't seen a good competitor (despite your own Prometheus / Grafana / Kibana dog food)
IMHO NewRelic is "promising since years" ;) good ideas but bad integration between their products. Their Dashboard query language is really nice but lacks critical functions like multiple data sets or advanced calculations. Needless to say you get all of that with Datadog.
Need help setting up a monitoring / logging / alarm infrastructure? Send me a message!
Hi Medeti,
you are right. Building based on your stack something with open source is heavy lifting. A lot of people I know start with such a set-up, but quickly run into frustration as they need to dedicated their best people to build a monitoring which is doing the job in a professional way.
As you are microservice focussed and are looking for 'low implementation and maintenance effort', you might want to have a look at INSTANA, which was built with modern tool stacks in mind. https://www.instana.com/apm-for-microservices/
We have a public sand-box available if you just want to have a look at the product once and of course also a free-trial: https://www.instana.com/getting-started-with-apm/
Let me know if you need anything on top.
I have hands on production experience both with New Relic and Datadog. I personally prefer Datadog over NewRelic because of the UI, the Documentation and the overall user/developer experience.
NewRelic however, can do basically the same things as Datadog can, and some of the features like alerting have been present in NewRelic for longer than in Datadog. The cool thing about NewRelic is their last-summer-updated pricing: you no longer pay per host but after data you send towards New Relic. This can be a huge cost saver depending on your particular setup
I'd go for Datadog, but given you have lots of containers I would also make a cost calculation. If the price difference is significant and there's a budget constraint NewRelic might be the better choice.
I haven't heard much about Datadog until about a year ago. Ironically, the NewRelic sales person who I had a series of trainings with was trash talking about Datadog a lot. That drew my attention to Datadog and I gave it a try at another client project where we needed log handling, dashboards and alerting.
In 2019, Datadog was already offering log management and from that perspective, it was ahead of NewRelic. Other than that, from my perspective, the two tools are offering a very-very similar set of tools. Therefore I wouldn't say there's a significant difference between the two, the decision is likely a matter of taste. The pricing is also very similar.
The reasons why we chose Datadog over NewRelic were:
- The presence of log handling feature (since then, logging is GA at NewRelic as well since falls 2019).
- The setup was easier even though I already had experience with NewRelic, including participation in NewRelic trainings.
- The UI of Datadog is more compact and my experience is smoother.
- The NewRelic UI is very fragmented and New Relic One is just increasing this experience for me.
- The log feature of Datadog is very well designed, I find very useful the tagging logs with services. The log filtering is also very awesome.
Bottom line is that both tools are great and it makes sense to discover both and making the decision based on your use case. In our case, Datadog was the clear winner due to its UI, ease of setup and the awesome logging and alerting features.
I chose Datadog APM because the much better APM insights it provides (flamegraph, percentiles by default).
The drawbacks of this decision are we had to move our production monitoring to TimescaleDB + Telegraf instead of NR Insight
NewRelic is definitely easier when starting out. Agent is only a lib and doesn't require a daemon
Pros of Datadog
- Monitoring for many apps (databases, web servers, etc)138
- Easy setup107
- Powerful ui87
- Powerful integrations84
- Great value70
- Great visualization54
- Events + metrics = clarity46
- Notifications41
- Custom metrics41
- Flexibility39
- Free & paid plans19
- Great customer support16
- Makes my life easier15
- Adapts automatically as i scale up10
- Easy setup and plugins9
- Super easy and powerful8
- In-context collaboration7
- AWS support7
- Rich in features6
- Docker support5
- Cute logo4
- Source control and bug tracking4
- Monitor almost everything4
- Cost4
- Full visibility of applications4
- Simple, powerful, great for infra4
- Easy to Analyze4
- Best than others4
- Automation tools4
- Best in the field3
- Free setup3
- Good for Startups3
- Expensive3
- APM2
Pros of Pingdom
- Simple and reliable224
- Monitoring your websites103
- Easy to use dashboard75
- Email, text & twitter alerts65
- Free tier43
- Performance data23
- Detailed Reports14
- Email Reports11
- Mobile App9
- Root Cause Analysis9
- 30-day risk free trial1
- Easy setup1
- IOS app1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Datadog
- Expensive19
- No errors exception tracking4
- External Network Goes Down You Wont Be Logging2
- Complicated1
Cons of Pingdom
- UI is incredibly complicated3
- Expensive3
- Hard to set up alerts properly2
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is Datadog?
What is Pingdom?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with Pingdom?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Blog Posts
+32
+31
+22
+46+34+43+37+26