Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Emacs vs gedit: What are the differences?
Introduction
Below are the key differences between Emacs and gedit:
Customization and Extensibility: Emacs is known for its high level of customization and extensibility. It offers a powerful scripting language called Emacs Lisp, which allows users to tailor the editor to their specific needs. On the other hand, gedit provides limited customization options compared to Emacs and does not have a built-in scripting language.
Operating System Compatibility: Emacs is compatible with various operating systems, including macOS, Linux, and Windows. It has a consistent user interface across different platforms. In contrast, gedit is primarily developed for GNOME-based Linux systems, although it can be installed on other platforms as well.
Integrated Development Environment (IDE) Features: Emacs comes with a wide range of built-in features that make it suitable for development tasks. It provides advanced functionality for programming languages, such as syntax highlighting, code navigation, code completion, and debugging integration. While gedit also supports some IDE features like syntax highlighting, it is not as feature-rich as Emacs in terms of development capabilities.
Learning Curve: Emacs has a steep learning curve due to its extensive customization options and complex command set. Users need to invest time in learning the different commands and customizing their workflow. In contrast, gedit is relatively easier to learn and has a more straightforward user interface, making it ideal for users who prefer simplicity and minimal configuration.
Memory Footprint: Emacs, being highly extensible and customizable, tends to have a larger memory footprint compared to gedit. It can consume significant system resources, especially when using packages and modes that add advanced functionality. Gedit, being a simpler text editor, has a smaller memory footprint and is generally more lightweight.
Community Support: Emacs has a large and active community of users and developers who contribute to its development and provide support through forums, mailing lists, and online resources. This allows users to find solutions to their issues and get help in customizing Emacs to their liking. While gedit also has a community, it may not be as extensive or active as the Emacs community, resulting in relatively limited support options.
In summary, Emacs offers extensive customization and extensibility options, cross-platform compatibility, advanced IDE features, a steep learning curve, a larger memory footprint, and a thriving community. On the other hand, gedit provides limited customization options, primarily targets GNOME-based Linux systems, has basic IDE features, an easier learning curve, a smaller memory footprint, and a comparatively smaller community.
Pros of Emacs
- Vast array of extensions65
- Have all you can imagine44
- Everything i need in one place40
- Portability39
- Customer config32
- Your config works on any platform16
- Low memory consumption13
- Perfect for monsters11
- All life inside one program10
- Extendable, portable, fast - all at your fingertips8
- Enables extremely rapid keyboard-only navigation6
- Widely-used keybindings (e.g. by bash)5
- Extensible in Lisp5
- Runs everywhere important5
- FOSS Software4
- Powerful multilanguage IDE4
- Git integration4
- May be old but always reliable4
- Asynchronous3
- Powerful UI3
- Huge ecosystem1
Pros of gedit
- Fast10
- Lightweight9
- GNOME Integration9
- Syntax Highlighting5
- Immediately starts3
- Tabbed UI3
- Free2
- I love gnu-linux2
- External tools and snippets1
- Supports every programming language1
- Spell Check1
- If you took cs50, you know gedit1
- Old gedit based on gtk21
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Emacs
- So good and extensible, that one can get sidetracked4
- Hard to learn for beginners4
- Not default preinstalled in GNU/linux1
Cons of gedit
- GTK32