Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

ExpressJS

31.4K
23.3K
+ 1
1.6K
Falcon

86
201
+ 1
89
Add tool

ExpressJS vs Falcon: What are the differences?

ExpressJS vs Falcon

ExpressJS and Falcon are both popular web frameworks utilized for building web applications. Below are the key differences between ExpressJS and Falcon:

  1. Architectural Design: ExpressJS follows the middleware approach, allowing developers to insert various functions that intercept requests and responses. In contrast, Falcon is designed around the concept of resource classes and certain high-level abstractions, providing a more streamlined structure for API development.

  2. Language Support: ExpressJS is essentially based on JavaScript and is widely used for developing applications in Node.js. On the other hand, Falcon is specifically designed for Python and focuses on creating RESTful web APIs, making it a preferred choice for Python developers.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: ExpressJS has a large community of developers and a vast ecosystem of modules and libraries available for extending its capabilities. Falcon, being relatively newer, has a smaller community but is steadily growing, with a focus on simplicity and performance over a wide range of features.

  4. Performance: Falcon is known for its high-performance capabilities, as it is designed for speed and efficiency in handling HTTP requests and responses. ExpressJS, while versatile and widely used, may not match the same level of performance optimization offered by Falcon in certain scenarios.

  5. Learning Curve: ExpressJS is known for its simplicity and ease of getting started, making it a popular choice for beginners and experienced developers alike. Falcon, with its more structured and opinionated approach, may have a steeper learning curve for those new to the framework or Python programming in general.

  6. Use Cases: ExpressJS is well-suited for building a variety of web applications, including websites, APIs, and full-scale web applications. Falcon, on the other hand, is particularly geared towards developing lightweight and fast APIs, making it an ideal choice for microservices and projects where performance is a critical factor.

In Summary, ExpressJS and Falcon differ in their architectural design, language support, community, performance, learning curve, and use cases, catering to distinct preferences and requirements in web development.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of ExpressJS
Pros of Falcon
  • 380
    Simple
  • 336
    Node.js
  • 244
    Javascript
  • 193
    High performance
  • 152
    Robust routing
  • 73
    Middlewares
  • 71
    Open source
  • 59
    Great community
  • 37
    Hybrid web applications
  • 16
    Well documented
  • 9
    Rapid development
  • 9
    Sinatra inspired
  • 7
    Socket connection
  • 7
    Isomorphic js.. superfast and easy
  • 5
    Light weight
  • 4
    Resource available for learning
  • 4
    Npm
  • 3
    Event loop
  • 3
    Callbacks
  • 2
    Data stream
  • 13
    Python
  • 11
    FAST
  • 10
    Minimal
  • 8
    Open source
  • 8
    REST oriented
  • 8
    Well designed
  • 6
    Powerful
  • 6
    Really Light Weight
  • 5
    Documentation
  • 5
    Easy to develop and maintain applications
  • 3
    Easy to get started
  • 3
    Easy to deploy
  • 2
    Its simple while not limited
  • 1
    Faster
  • 0
    Kkk

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of ExpressJS
Cons of Falcon
  • 27
    Not python
  • 17
    Overrated
  • 14
    No multithreading
  • 9
    Javascript
  • 5
    Not fast
  • 3
    Easily Insecure for Novices
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    What is ExpressJS?

    Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

    What is Falcon?

    Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention ExpressJS and Falcon as a desired skillset
    What companies use ExpressJS?
    What companies use Falcon?
    See which teams inside your own company are using ExpressJS or Falcon.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with ExpressJS?
    What tools integrate with Falcon?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    Node.jsnpmKubernetes+6
    1
    1435
    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
    14
    13459
    GitHubPythonNode.js+26
    29
    15977
    Jun 19 2015 at 6:37AM

    ReadMe.io

    JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+25
    12
    2378
    What are some alternatives to ExpressJS and Falcon?
    Koa
    Koa aims to be a smaller, more expressive, and more robust foundation for web applications and APIs. Through leveraging generators Koa allows you to ditch callbacks and greatly increase error-handling. Koa does not bundle any middleware.
    React
    Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.
    Flask
    Flask is intended for getting started very quickly and was developed with best intentions in mind.
    Django
    Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.
    Golang
    Go is expressive, concise, clean, and efficient. Its concurrency mechanisms make it easy to write programs that get the most out of multicore and networked machines, while its novel type system enables flexible and modular program construction. Go compiles quickly to machine code yet has the convenience of garbage collection and the power of run-time reflection. It's a fast, statically typed, compiled language that feels like a dynamically typed, interpreted language.
    See all alternatives