Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Fisheye

41
41
+ 1
0
GitLab

60.7K
52K
+ 1
2.5K
Add tool

Fisheye vs GitLab: What are the differences?

Introduction:

In this Markdown document, the key differences between Fisheye and GitLab will be highlighted. Fisheye is a source code management and analysis tool developed by Atlassian, while GitLab is a web-based Git repository management platform.

  1. Integration Capability: Fisheye primarily integrates with other Atlassian products like JIRA, Confluence, and Bitbucket. It allows for seamless integration between these tools, enabling a smooth workflow for software development teams. On the other hand, GitLab is an all-in-one platform that offers not only Git repository management but also integrated CI/CD, issue tracking, wiki, and more. GitLab's integration capabilities extend beyond its own ecosystem, supporting integrations with external services like Jenkins, Kubernetes, and Slack.

  2. Code Review Features: Fisheye provides a comprehensive set of code review features, including side-by-side diffs, commenting, and annotation. It facilitates collaborative code reviews and enables teams to provide feedback directly on the code. In contrast, GitLab also offers code review capabilities with similar features, but it goes a step further by integrating a built-in Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD) system. This integration allows for automated code testing, validation, and deployment directly from the code review process.

  3. Git Workflow Support: Fisheye is designed to work with multiple version control systems, including Git. While it can be used for Git-based repositories, its primary focus remains on centralized version control systems like Subversion (SVN). On the other hand, GitLab is built specifically for Git-based workflows. It provides native support for Git functionalities, such as branching, merging, and rebasing.

  4. Scalability: Fisheye is a self-hosted tool that is typically installed on a dedicated server. Its scalability is dependent on the hardware and resources allocated to the server. GitLab, on the other hand, offers both self-managed and cloud-based options. The self-managed version allows organizations to deploy GitLab on their own infrastructure, providing scalability based on their own server resources. The cloud-based option offered by GitLab, known as GitLab.com, provides a scalable and managed solution that eliminates the need for organizations to manage their own infrastructure.

  5. Issue Tracking and Project Management: Fisheye does not have built-in issue tracking or project management capabilities. It primarily focuses on code analysis and review. In contrast, GitLab provides a complete project management suite that includes issue tracking, project boards, milestones, and more. This allows teams to manage their software development projects within the same platform, streamlining communication and collaboration.

  6. Community and Support: Fisheye is a proprietary software developed by Atlassian. It has an active user community and receives support from Atlassian through documentation, forums, and support tickets. GitLab, on the other hand, is developed as an open-source project and has a large and active community of contributors. This broad community support provides users with access to a wealth of resources, including forums, community-contributed documentation, and open-source extensions.

In summary, Fisheye is primarily focused on analyzing and reviewing code, with integrations to other Atlassian tools, while GitLab offers an all-in-one platform with native Git support, built-in CI/CD, issue tracking, project management, and scalable deployment options. GitLab also benefits from a larger and active open-source community.

Decisions about Fisheye and GitLab
Elmar Wouters
CEO, Managing Director at Wouters Media · | 7 upvotes · 495.5K views

I first used BitBucket because it had private repo's, and it didn't disappoint me. Also with the smooth integration of Jira, the decision to use BitBucket as a full application maintenance service was as easy as 1, 2, 3.

I honestly love BitBucket, by the looks, by the UI, and the smooth integration with Tower.

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Do you review your Pull/Merge Request before assigning Reviewers?

If you work in a team opening a Pull Request (or Merge Request) looks appropriate. However, have you ever thought about opening a Pull/Merge Request when working by yourself? Here's a checklist of things you can review in your own:

  • Pick the correct target branch
  • Make Drafts explicit
  • Name things properly
  • Ask help for tools
  • Remove the noise
  • Fetch necessary data
  • Understand Mergeability
  • Pass the message
  • Add screenshots
  • Be found in the future
  • Comment inline in your changes

Read the blog post for more detailed explanation for each item :D

What else do you review before asking for code review?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

Using an inclusive language is crucial for fostering a diverse culture. Git has changed the naming conventions to be more language-inclusive, and so you should change. Our development tools, like GitHub and GitLab, already supports the change.

SourceLevel deals very nicely with repositories that changed the master branch to a more appropriate word. Besides, you can use the grep linter the look for exclusive terms contained in the source code.

As the inclusive language gap may happen in other aspects of our lives, have you already thought about them?

See more
Weverton Timoteo

One of the magic tricks git performs is the ability to rewrite log history. You can do it in many ways, but git rebase -i is the one I most use. With this command, It’s possible to switch commits order, remove a commit, squash two or more commits, or edit, for instance.

It’s particularly useful to run it before opening a pull request. It allows developers to “clean up” the mess and organize commits before submitting to review. If you follow the practice 3 and 4, then the list of commits should look very similar to a task list. It should reveal the rationale you had, telling the story of how you end up with that final code.

See more
Kamaleshwar BN
Senior Software Engineer at Pulley · | 8 upvotes · 661.8K views

Out of most of the VCS solutions out there, we found Gitlab was the most feature complete with a free community edition. Their DevSecops offering is also a very robust solution. Gitlab CI/CD was quite easy to setup and the direct integration with your VCS + CI/CD is also a bonus. Out of the box integration with major cloud providers, alerting through instant messages etc. are all extremely convenient. We push our CI/CD updates to MS Teams.

See more

Gitlab as A LOT of features that GitHub and Azure DevOps are missing. Even if both GH and Azure are backed by Microsoft, GitLab being open source has a faster upgrade rate and the hosted by gitlab.com solution seems more appealing than anything else! Quick win: the UI is way better and the Pipeline is way easier to setup on GitLab!

See more
Nazar Atamaniuk
Shared insights
on
DeployPlaceDeployPlaceGitHubGitHubGitLabGitLab

At DeployPlace we use self-hosted GitLab, we have chosen GitLab as most of us are familiar with it. We are happy with all features GitLab provides, I can’t imagine our life without integrated GitLab CI. Another important feature for us is integrated code review tool, we use it every day, we use merge requests, code reviews, branching. To be honest, most of us have GitHub accounts as well, we like to contribute in open source, and we want to be a part of the tech community, but lack of solutions from GitHub in the area of CI doesn’t let us chose it for our projects.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Fisheye
Pros of GitLab
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 508
      Self hosted
    • 430
      Free
    • 339
      Has community edition
    • 242
      Easy setup
    • 240
      Familiar interface
    • 137
      Includes many features, including ci
    • 113
      Nice UI
    • 84
      Good integration with gitlabci
    • 57
      Simple setup
    • 34
      Free private repository
    • 34
      Has an official mobile app
    • 31
      Continuous Integration
    • 22
      Open source, great ui (like github)
    • 18
      Slack Integration
    • 14
      Full CI flow
    • 11
      Free and unlimited private git repos
    • 10
      User, group, and project access management is simple
    • 9
      All in one (Git, CI, Agile..)
    • 8
      Built-in CI
    • 8
      Intuitive UI
    • 6
      Both public and private Repositories
    • 6
      Full DevOps suite with Git
    • 5
      Build/pipeline definition alongside code
    • 5
      CI
    • 5
      So easy to use
    • 5
      Integrated Docker Registry
    • 5
      It's powerful source code management tool
    • 4
      Issue system
    • 4
      Dockerized
    • 4
      Unlimited free repos & collaborators
    • 4
      Security and Stable
    • 4
      On-premises
    • 4
      It's fully integrated
    • 4
      Mattermost Chat client
    • 4
      Excellent
    • 3
      Great for team collaboration
    • 3
      Built-in Docker Registry
    • 3
      Low maintenance cost due omnibus-deployment
    • 3
      I like the its runners and executors feature
    • 3
      Free private repos
    • 3
      Because is the best remote host for git repositories
    • 3
      Not Microsoft Owned
    • 3
      Opensource
    • 2
      Groups of groups
    • 2
      Powerful software planning and maintaining tools
    • 2
      Review Apps feature
    • 2
      Kubernetes integration with GitLab CI
    • 2
      It includes everything I need, all packaged with docker
    • 2
      Multilingual interface
    • 2
      HipChat intergration
    • 2
      Powerful Continuous Integration System
    • 2
      One-click install through DigitalOcean
    • 2
      The dashboard with deployed environments
    • 2
      Native CI
    • 2
      Many private repo
    • 2
      Kubernetes Integration
    • 2
      Published IP list for whitelisting (gl-infra#434)
    • 2
      Wounderful
    • 2
      Beautiful
    • 1
      Supports Radius/Ldap & Browser Code Edits

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Fisheye
    Cons of GitLab
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 28
        Slow ui performance
      • 8
        Introduce breaking bugs every release
      • 6
        Insecure (no published IP list for whitelisting)
      • 2
        Built-in Docker Registry
      • 1
        Review Apps feature

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is Fisheye?

      FishEye provides a read-only window into your Subversion, Perforce, CVS, Git, and Mercurial repositories, all in one place. Keep a pulse on everything about your code: Visualize and report on activity, integrate source with JIRA issues, and search for commits, files, revisions, or people.

      What is GitLab?

      GitLab offers git repository management, code reviews, issue tracking, activity feeds and wikis. Enterprises install GitLab on-premise and connect it with LDAP and Active Directory servers for secure authentication and authorization. A single GitLab server can handle more than 25,000 users but it is also possible to create a high availability setup with multiple active servers.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Fisheye?
      What companies use GitLab?
      See which teams inside your own company are using Fisheye or GitLab.
      Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with Fisheye?
      What tools integrate with GitLab?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      What are some alternatives to Fisheye and GitLab?
      Bitbucket
      Bitbucket gives teams one place to plan projects, collaborate on code, test and deploy, all with free private Git repositories. Teams choose Bitbucket because it has a superior Jira integration, built-in CI/CD, & is free for up to 5 users.
      Sourcegraph
      Sourcegraph is a universal code search tool that lets you find and fix things across ALL your code -- any code host, any repo, any language. Stay in flow and find your answers quickly with smart filters, and more.
      Hound by Etsy
      Hound is an extremely fast source code search engine. The core is based on this article (and code) from Russ Cox: Regular Expression Matching with a Trigram Index. Hound itself is a static React frontend that talks to a Go backend. The backend keeps an up-to-date index for each repository and answers searches through a minimal API.
      Quod AI
      Search engine to find source code across all your Git repositories quickly. Search using keywords, exact code, fuzzy, semantic search & more.
      CodeQL
      It is an industry-leading semantic code analysis engine that is used to discover vulnerabilities across a codebase. It lets you query code as though it were data. Write a query to find all variants of a vulnerability, eradicating it forever. Then share your query to help others do the same.
      See all alternatives