Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Jest

9.3K
3.8K
+ 1
175
Majestic GUI

2
13
+ 1
0
Mocha

8.5K
2.9K
+ 1
430
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Jest
Pros of Majestic GUI
Pros of Mocha
  • 36
    Open source
  • 32
    Mock by default makes testing much simpler
  • 23
    Testing React Native Apps
  • 20
    Parallel test running
  • 16
    Fast
  • 13
    Bundled with JSDOM to enable DOM testing
  • 8
    Mock by default screws up your classes, breaking tests
  • 7
    Out of the box code coverage
  • 7
    Promise support
  • 6
    One stop shop for unit testing
  • 3
    Great documentation
  • 2
    Assert Library Included
  • 1
    Built in watch option with interactive filtering menu
  • 1
    Preset support
  • 0
    Can be used for BDD
  • 0
    Karma
    Be the first to leave a pro
    • 137
      Open source
    • 102
      Simple
    • 81
      Promise support
    • 48
      Flexible
    • 29
      Easy to add support for Generators
    • 12
      For browser and server testing
    • 7
      Curstom assertion libraries
    • 5
      Works with Karma
    • 3
      No other better tools
    • 1
      Simple setup
    • 1
      Works with saucelabs
    • 1
      Lots of tutorials and help online
    • 1
      Default reporter is nice, clean, and itemized
    • 1
      Works with BrowserStack
    • 1
      Simple integration testing

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    Cons of Jest
    Cons of Majestic GUI
    Cons of Mocha
    • 4
      Documentation
    • 4
      Ambiguous configuration
    • 3
      Difficult
    • 2
      Many bugs still not fixed months/years after reporting
    • 2
      Multiple error messages for same error
    • 2
      Difficult to run single test/describe/file
    • 2
      Ambiguous
    • 2
      Bugged
    • 1
      BeforeAll timing out makes all passing tests fail
    • 1
      Slow
    • 1
      Reporter is too general
    • 1
      Unstable
    • 1
      Bad docs
    • 1
      Still does't support .mjs files natively
    • 1
      Can't fail beforeAll to abort tests
    • 0
      Interaction with watch mode on terminal
      Be the first to leave a con
      • 3
        Cannot test a promisified functions without assertion
      • 2
        No assertion count in results
      • 1
        Not as many reporter options as Jest

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      - No public GitHub repository available -
      - No public GitHub repository available -

      What is Jest?

      Jest provides you with multiple layers on top of Jasmine.

      What is Majestic GUI?

      A GUI for Jest that allows you to run all the tests or a single file, toggle watch mode, update snapshots, and much more.

      What is Mocha?

      Mocha is a feature-rich JavaScript test framework running on node.js and the browser, making asynchronous testing simple and fun. Mocha tests run serially, allowing for flexible and accurate reporting, while mapping uncaught exceptions to the correct test cases.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      What companies use Jest?
      What companies use Majestic GUI?
      What companies use Mocha?
        No companies found

        Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

        What tools integrate with Jest?
        What tools integrate with Majestic GUI?
        What tools integrate with Mocha?

        Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

        Blog Posts

        JavaScriptGitHubNode.js+29
        14
        13438
        JavaScriptGitHubGit+33
        20
        2087
        What are some alternatives to Jest, Majestic GUI, and Mocha?
        Selenium
        Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that. Boring web-based administration tasks can (and should!) also be automated as well.
        AVA
        Even though JavaScript is single-threaded, IO in Node.js can happen in parallel due to its async nature. AVA takes advantage of this and runs your tests concurrently, which is especially beneficial for IO heavy tests. In addition, test files are run in parallel as separate processes, giving you even better performance and an isolated environment for each test file.
        Enzyme
        Enzyme is a JavaScript Testing utility for React that makes it easier to assert, manipulate, and traverse your React Components' output.
        Jasmine
        Jasmine is a Behavior Driven Development testing framework for JavaScript. It does not rely on browsers, DOM, or any JavaScript framework. Thus it's suited for websites, Node.js projects, or anywhere that JavaScript can run.
        Cypress
        Cypress is a front end automated testing application created for the modern web. Cypress is built on a new architecture and runs in the same run-loop as the application being tested. As a result Cypress provides better, faster, and more reliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Cypress works on any front-end framework or website.
        See all alternatives