Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Material Design for Angular vs Vapor: What are the differences?
Developers describe Material Design for Angular as "Material Design for AngularJS Apps". Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs. On the other hand, Vapor is detailed as "A type-safe web framework for Swift". Vapor is the first true web framework for Swift. It provides a beautifully expressive foundation for your app without tying you to any single server implementation.
Material Design for Angular can be classified as a tool in the "Front-End Frameworks" category, while Vapor is grouped under "Frameworks (Full Stack)".
"Ui components" is the primary reason why developers consider Material Design for Angular over the competitors, whereas "Fast" was stated as the key factor in picking Vapor.
Material Design for Angular and Vapor are both open source tools. Vapor with 16.7K GitHub stars and 989 forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K GitHub forks.
According to the StackShare community, Material Design for Angular has a broader approval, being mentioned in 279 company stacks & 369 developers stacks; compared to Vapor, which is listed in 6 company stacks and 5 developer stacks.
Pros of Material Design for Angular
- Ui components121
- Backed by google62
- Free51
- Backed by angular50
- Javascript47
- Open source34
- Responsiveness32
- Easy to learn30
- Quick to develop28
- Customizable20
- Powerful8
- Easy to start8
- Flexible6
- Themes6
- Flexbox Layouts4
- Great community3
- I like its design3
- Great extensions2
- Consistents1
- CDK1
- It's the best looking out of the box1
- Seamless integration with AngularJS but lack of docs1
- Progressive Web Apps - to learn0
Pros of Vapor
- Fast13
- Swift11
- Type-safe10
- Great for apis6
- Readable5
- Compiled to machine code5
- Good Abstraction5
- Asynchronous5
- Maintainable3
- Complete1
- Mature1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Material Design for Angular
- No practical examples4
Cons of Vapor
- Server side swift is still in its infancy1
- Not as much support available.1