Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Add tool
MkDocs vs Read the Docs: What are the differences?
- Storage and Hosting: The key difference between MkDocs and Read the Docs lies in the storage and hosting approach. MkDocs generates static HTML files, meaning the documentation is stored and hosted on a server or web hosting platform as simple HTML pages. On the other hand, Read the Docs dynamically generates documentation in real-time, querying the code repository and dynamically serving the documentation pages.
- Configuration and Customization: MkDocs provides a more straightforward and simplistic configuration system, with a single configuration file (usually named mkdocs.yml) where users can define basic settings and options. Read the Docs, on the other hand, offers more extensive customization options through its comprehensive configuration system, allowing fine-grained control over themes, translations, and versioning.
-
Build Process: MkDocs has a simple build process, where running the build command (e.g.,
mkdocs build
) generates the entire documentation site in the output directory. This process is relatively fast, making it easy to update and publish changes. Read the Docs, however, has a more complex build process, involving a multitude of steps such as fetching the code, building the documentation, managing versions, and configuring the server. This can slow down the overall build and deployment process. - Search Functionality: MkDocs relies on third-party search plugins or tools for implementing search functionality in the documentation site. Users can choose from a range of available plugins or tools that integrate with MkDocs. Read the Docs, on the other hand, includes a built-in search functionality that is automatically enabled for all projects. This eliminates the need for additional setup or configuration for search capabilities.
- Support for Multiple Versions: MkDocs does not have built-in support for managing multiple versions of documentation. Each version of the documentation needs to be manually managed and maintained separately. Read the Docs, however, offers robust versioning support, allowing easy management of multiple versions of the documentation site. It enables users to switch between different versions, view specific historical releases, and compare changes between versions.
- Hosting Options: MkDocs allows users to choose and set up their preferred hosting platform or server for their documentation site. It provides flexibility in hosting options, allowing users to select a hosting solution that aligns with their specific requirements. In contrast, Read the Docs hosts the documentation directly on its platform, eliminating the need for users to set up their hosting infrastructure. This simplifies the hosting process, particularly for users who prefer an all-in-one solution.
In Summary, MkDocs and Read the Docs differ in their storage and hosting approach, configuration and customization options, build process complexity, search functionality, support for multiple versions, and hosting options.
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn MorePros of MkDocs
Pros of Read the Docs
Pros of MkDocs
- Speed5
- Gitlab integration4
- Extensibility3
- Themes2
Pros of Read the Docs
- GitHub integration13
- Free for public repos7
- Automated Builds2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MkDocs
Cons of Read the Docs
Cons of MkDocs
- Build time increases exponentially as site grows1
Cons of Read the Docs
Be the first to leave a con
Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions
What is MkDocs?
It builds completely static HTML sites that you can host on GitHub pages, Amazon S3, or anywhere else you choose. There's a stack of good looking themes available. The built-in dev-server allows you to preview your documentation as you're writing it. It will even auto-reload and refresh your browser whenever you save your changes.
What is Read the Docs?
It hosts documentation, making it fully searchable and easy to find. You can import your docs using any major version control system, including Mercurial, Git, Subversion, and Bazaar.
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Jobs that mention MkDocs and Read the Docs as a desired skillset
What companies use MkDocs?
What companies use Read the Docs?
What companies use MkDocs?
What companies use Read the Docs?
See which teams inside your own company are using MkDocs or Read the Docs.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn MoreSign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with MkDocs?
What tools integrate with Read the Docs?
What tools integrate with MkDocs?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
What are some alternatives to MkDocs and Read the Docs?
Sphinx
It lets you either batch index and search data stored in an SQL database, NoSQL storage, or just files quickly and easily — or index and search data on the fly, working with it pretty much as with a database server.
Gitbook
It is a modern documentation platform where teams can document everything from products, to APIs and internal knowledge-bases. It is a place to think and track ideas for you & your team.
Jekyll
Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
Docsify
Docsify generates your documentation website on the fly without generating static html files. Instead, it loads and parses your Markdown files and displays them as a website.
Hugo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.