TypeScript vs Vuetify

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

TypeScript

91.3K
70.5K
+ 1
502
Vuetify

1.2K
1.8K
+ 1
170
Add tool

TypeScript vs Vuetify: What are the differences?

Introduction:

TypeScript and Vuetify are both popular technologies used in web development. While TypeScript is a programming language, Vuetify is a framework. Below are the key differences between TypeScript and Vuetify:

1. Type System and Language Features:

TypeScript is primarily known for its rich type system, which allows developers to add type annotations to variables, function parameters, and return types. This feature helps catch bugs at compile-time and provides better code documentation. On the other hand, Vuetify is a UI framework built upon Vue.js that provides a set of pre-designed components and styles to build responsive user interfaces. It doesn't introduce any specific type system or language features.

2. Focus and Purpose:

TypeScript is designed to enhance JavaScript by adding optional static typing, which results in safer and more maintainable code. It provides features such as interfaces, classes, and modules, enabling developers to write object-oriented code. In contrast, Vuetify's main focus is to simplify the process of designing responsive user interfaces using Vue.js. It offers a wide range of ready-to-use components, styles, and layout options that adhere to Material Design principles.

3. Development Environment:

TypeScript requires a TypeScript compiler to transpile the code into JavaScript that can be executed by web browsers. This extra step in the development workflow may require configuration and additional build steps. In contrast, Vuetify can be used directly in a Vue.js project without any additional build steps. It can be imported as a library, and its components can be used directly in Vue.js templates.

4. Community and Ecosystem:

TypeScript has gained significant popularity over the years and has a large and active community. It is widely supported by major IDEs, text editors, and build tools. TypeScript has its own package manager called npm, which allows developers to easily integrate third-party libraries and modules into their projects. Vuetify, being a UI framework, also has a dedicated community, but it is more specific to Vue.js development. It has its own set of plugins and extensions, but the ecosystem might be relatively smaller compared to TypeScript.

5. Learning Curve and Familiarity:

TypeScript introduces additional syntax and concepts, such as static types, interfaces, and decorators, which might require learning for developers who are already familiar with JavaScript. However, developers with a background in statically typed languages like Java or C# might find it easier to grasp TypeScript. Vuetify, on the other hand, is built upon Vue.js, so developers already familiar with Vue.js will find it easy to start using Vuetify. However, developers who are new to Vue.js might need some time to understand the Vue.js concepts before working with Vuetify.

6. Project Size and Scalability:

TypeScript is suitable for large-scale projects with complex logic and multiple developers working together. Its strong type system provides better code organization, maintainability, and IDE support, making it easier to handle larger codebases. Vuetify, being a UI framework, provides a set of components and styles that can be easily reused across the project. It simplifies the process of building user interfaces, especially for smaller or medium-sized projects. However, it might not be as suitable for large-scale projects compared to TypeScript.

In Summary, TypeScript and Vuetify differ in terms of their type system and language features, focus and purpose, development environment, community and ecosystem, learning curve and familiarity, and suitability for project size and scalability.

Advice on TypeScript and Vuetify
Needs advice
on
TypeScriptTypeScript
and
Flow (JS)Flow (JS)

From a StackShare community member: "We are looking to rewrite our outdated front-end with TypeScript. Right now we have a mix of CoffeeScript and vanilla JavaScript. I have read that adopting TypeScript can help enforce better code quality, and best practices. I also heard good things about Flow (JS). Which one would you recommend and why?"

See more
Replies (14)
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because:

  • incredible developer tooling and community support
  • actively developed and supported by Microsoft (yes, I like Microsoft) ;)
  • easier to make sense of a TS codebase because the annotations provide so much more context than plain JS
  • refactors become easier (VSCode has superb support for TS)

I've switched back and forth between TS and Flow and decided a year ago to abandon Flow completely in favor of TS. I don't want to bash Flow, however, my main grievances are very poor tooling (editor integration leaves much to be desired), a slower release cycle, and subpar docs and community support.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because it isn't just about validating the types I'm expecting to receive though that is a huge part of it too. Flow (JS) seems to be a type system only. TypeScript also allows you to use the latest features of JavaScript while also providing the type checking. To be fair to Flow (JS), I have not used it, but likely wouldn't have due to the additional features I get from TypeScript.

See more
David Koblas
VP Engineering at Not disclosed · | 9 upvotes · 162.7K views
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript
at

We originally (in 2017) started rewriting our platform from JavaScript to Flow (JS) but found the library support for Flow was lacking. After switching gears to TypeScript we've never looked back. At this point we're finding that frontend and backend libraries are supporting TypeScript out of the box and where the support is missing that the commuity is typically got a solution in hand.

See more
Forrest Norvell
engineering manager at self-employed · | 6 upvotes · 252.7K views
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because the tooling is more mature (the decision to discontinue TSLint in favor of moving all its checks to ESLint is a thoughtful and mature decision), there's a ton of examples and tutorials for it, and it just generally seems to be where the industry is headed. Flow (JS) is a fine tool, but it just hasn't seen the uptake that TS has, and as a result is lacking a lot of the nicer small things, like thorough Visual Studio Code integration, offered by TS.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

We currently use TypeScript at work. Previously we used Flow (JS) but it was sometimes really difficult to make the types work the way you want. Especially non-trivial types were problematic. And the IDE support wasn't good, Flow took too much resources and sometimes remain stuck and do not show errors (I use Visual Studio Code). With TypeScript we almost do not have these problems. IDE support is superb, working with types is much easier and typing system seems more mature and powerful. There are some downsides (like partion inheritance etc.), but TS team is still pushing it forward. So for me TypeScript is clear winner.

See more
Tim Abbott
Recommends
on
UnderscoreUnderscore
at

We use Underscore because it's a reasonable library for providing all the reasonable helper functions missing from JavaScript ES5 (or that perform poorly if you use the default ES5 version).

Since we're migrating the codebase to TypeScript , we'll likely end up removing most usage of it and ultimately no longer needing it, but we've been very happy with the library.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because it's adoption by many developers, it's supported by many companies, and it's growth. AngularJS, React, @ASP.NET Core. I started using it in .NET Core, then for a job. Later I added more Angular experience and wrote more React software. It makes your code easier to understand and read... which means it makes other people's code easier to understand and read.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript for Web Applications and for both frontend and backend because it has a lot of tooling around it and they really got the types and type safety right. Flow (JS) on the other hand lacks tooling and most of the times I scramble to find the right way of building my contracts in which TypeScript is very intuitive and natural. Additionally TypeScript is very similar to Java so your backend engineers and full stack engineers can work with it without much of context switch.

The only time I think Flow shines is (based on probably my outdated knowledge) Flow is/was the only option if you want/wanted to build a React Native application mainly because React Native transpiler at the time I was working with it would only work with flow.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because it's the most mature/issue-free Javascript type-checker available, as far as I've seen.

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

If you will start a project from scratch I recommend to use TypeScript. But, If you work with legacy projects written in JavaScript I recommend Flow (JS). Both tools have the same objective: reduce the bad code (which create illegible code, generate bugs e problems to maintenance). Flex helps you to avoid fall in bad codes, but TypeScript prevent you to c you to create bad codes. I believe cause this some JavaScript fans don't like TS, because TS block you to write some types o code. This is the fundamental difference between TS and Flow: Flow avoid problems, but no force. TS force you to prevent problems.

See more
Frédéric MARAND
Core Developer at OSInet · | 2 upvotes · 135K views
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because I tried both on a Meteor project, and found the quantity of errors it enabled us to catch and the simplification of code it allowed was higher than Flow (JS).

See more
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because of broad support, on tools, repos, community ... the only reason to consider flow is if you're a facebook employee

See more
Damian Esteban
CTO @ betterPT at BetterPT · | 1 upvotes · 122.7K views
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript
at

I recommend TypeScript. When used correctly, TypeScript can enable your application to be scalable, easy to refactor, safe, and stable. One of the biggest draws of working with any typed language is that it forces you to think about your functions' inputs and outputs. This is invaluable as it can lead to more declarative, functional style code that ultimately can be easier to reason about.

TypeScript is however not a silver bullet. Just like anything new it takes time to fully understand the concepts of types, interfaces, abstract classes, and enums. In my experience engineers who excel when using TypeScript are those who have experience working with a statically typed language.

See more
Rafael Avaria
Ingeniero civil en electrónica · | 1 upvotes · 121.5K views
Recommends
on
TypeScriptTypeScript

I use TypeScript because i love to program in Angular and used in node as well

See more
Decisions about TypeScript and Vuetify
Vladyslav Holubiev
Sr. Directory of Technology at Shelf · | 3 upvotes · 138.9K views

As our codebase grew in size, we were looking for ways to improve code quality. We chose TypeScript over Flow due to its rapid industry adoption and overall tools support.

We noticed how different open-source projects were migrating from Flow to TypeScript. Most notably, it was Jest, even though Jest and Flow were both developed by Facebook. See this HN thread if you want to dive into an interesting discussion around this move.

Additionally, at the beginning of 2019, both Babel and ESLint enabled seamless TypeScript support, which allowed easy migration path in a backward-compatible way.

See more
Oleksandr Fedotov
Senior Software Engineer at joyn · | 4 upvotes · 120.2K views

Initially making a decision to use Flow vs Typescript we decided to go with flow as we wanted our code to run in a way we wrote it, because when using Flow types are simply removed from the code without modifying the code itself. Sadly, the type system of Flow was in some cases very hard to understand and declare the types correctly, especially in cases when the structure is very dynamic (e.g. object keys and values are created dynamically). Another reason was bad integration with IDE and frequent crashes which made DX very poor. Therefore, we made another evaluation of Typescript and decided to move towards it. As our code base was pretty big when we decided to migrate to TS we couldn't just stop and re-write everything, that's why we started writing new modules in Typescript as well as transforming old components. To make that possible we had to configure Webpack loader to support simultaneous bundling of Flow&JS and Typescript. After around 2 months of the transformation we have around 40% of code being written in Typescript and we are more than happy with integration TS has with IDE, as well as ease of declaring types for dynamic modules and functions.

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of TypeScript
Pros of Vuetify
  • 174
    More intuitive and type safe javascript
  • 106
    Type safe
  • 80
    JavaScript superset
  • 48
    The best AltJS ever
  • 27
    Best AltJS for BackEnd
  • 15
    Powerful type system, including generics & JS features
  • 11
    Compile time errors
  • 11
    Nice and seamless hybrid of static and dynamic typing
  • 10
    Aligned with ES development for compatibility
  • 7
    Angular
  • 7
    Structural, rather than nominal, subtyping
  • 5
    Starts and ends with JavaScript
  • 1
    Garbage collection
  • 29
    Enables beauty for graphically challenged devs
  • 24
    Wide range of components and active development
  • 22
    Vue
  • 18
    New age components
  • 13
    Easy integration
  • 11
    Material Design
  • 10
    Nuxt.js
  • 10
    Open Source
  • 6
    Awesome Documentation
  • 5
    Awesome Component collection
  • 5
    Internationalization
  • 5
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 4
    Best use of vue slots you'll ever see
  • 2
    Not tied to jQuery
  • 2
    Treeshaking
  • 2
    Active Community
  • 2
    Responsiveness

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of TypeScript
Cons of Vuetify
  • 5
    Code may look heavy and confusing
  • 4
    Hype
  • 19
    It is heavy
  • 3
    Not Vue 3 Ready (Alpha-Version)

Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

What is TypeScript?

TypeScript is a language for application-scale JavaScript development. It's a typed superset of JavaScript that compiles to plain JavaScript.

What is Vuetify?

Vuetify is a component framework for Vue.js 2. It aims to provide clean, semantic and reusable components that make building your application a breeze. Vuetify utilizes Google's Material Design design pattern, taking cues from other popular frameworks such as Materialize.css, Material Design Lite, Semantic UI and Bootstrap 4.

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

What companies use TypeScript?
What companies use Vuetify?
See which teams inside your own company are using TypeScript or Vuetify.
Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

What tools integrate with TypeScript?
What tools integrate with Vuetify?

Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

Blog Posts

What are some alternatives to TypeScript and Vuetify?
Flow
Flow is an online collaboration platform that makes it easy for people to create, organize, discuss, and accomplish tasks with anyone, anytime, anywhere. By merging a sleek, intuitive interface with powerful functionality, we're out to revolutionize the way the world's productive teams get things done.
JavaScript
JavaScript is most known as the scripting language for Web pages, but used in many non-browser environments as well such as node.js or Apache CouchDB. It is a prototype-based, multi-paradigm scripting language that is dynamic,and supports object-oriented, imperative, and functional programming styles.
Dart
Dart is a cohesive, scalable platform for building apps that run on the web (where you can use Polymer) or on servers (such as with Google Cloud Platform). Use the Dart language, libraries, and tools to write anything from simple scripts to full-featured apps.
Babel
Babel will turn your ES6+ code into ES5 friendly code, so you can start using it right now without waiting for browser support.
Elm
Writing HTML apps is super easy with elm-lang/html. Not only does it render extremely fast, it also quietly guides you towards well-architected code.
See all alternatives