NGINX vs Varnish

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NGINX

112.3K
60.1K
+ 1
5.5K
Varnish

12.4K
2.6K
+ 1
370
Add tool

Varnish vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown document, we will discuss the key differences between Varnish and Nginx. Both Varnish and Nginx are popular open-source web servers that are used to improve website performance and handle high traffic. Despite having some similar features, there are several distinct differences between these two servers.

  1. Caching Mechanism: Varnish is primarily designed as a caching HTTP reverse proxy, whereas Nginx is a versatile web server that can support various functionalities including caching. Varnish stores a copy of the requested web page in memory, which allows it to serve subsequent requests directly from the cache without hitting the backend server. On the other hand, Nginx employs an on-disk caching mechanism that stores frequently accessed files on the file system for faster delivery.

  2. Performance: Varnish is renowned for its exceptional performance and efficiency in handling high volumes of traffic. It is specifically designed to deliver content quickly by utilizing its advanced caching capabilities. Nginx also performs well, but when it comes to handling heavy loads and serving static content, Varnish outshines Nginx due to its specialized caching architecture.

  3. Flexibility and Versatility: Nginx offers more flexibility and versatility compared to Varnish. While Varnish is mainly focused on caching and enhancing performance, Nginx is a full-fledged web server that supports a broad range of functionalities such as load balancing, SSL/TLS termination, proxying, and more. Nginx can act both as a caching proxy server and a regular web server, making it a more adaptable choice for different use cases.

  4. Configuration Language: Varnish uses its own domain-specific language called VCL (Varnish Configuration Language) for configuration, which is specific to Varnish and requires learning a new syntax. On the other hand, Nginx utilizes a more familiar and widely-used configuration syntax based on the NGINX.conf file, which makes it easier for users familiar with web server configurations.

  5. SSL/TLS Termination: Nginx has built-in support for SSL/TLS termination, allowing it to handle encrypted web traffic directly. In contrast, Varnish lacks native SSL/TLS termination functionality and typically requires an additional web server (like Nginx or Apache) to handle the SSL/TLS encryption. This additional layer can introduce some overhead and potentially impact performance.

  6. Rewriting and Redirects: Nginx provides more advanced and flexible options for URL rewriting and redirects. It offers a robust and powerful rewriting module that enables complex URL manipulation, including regular expression-based rewriting. Varnish also supports basic URL rewriting but doesn't provide the same level of flexibility and functionality as Nginx in this regard.

In summary, Varnish and Nginx differ in their primary focus, performance capabilities, versatility, configuration language, SSL/TLS termination support, and URL rewriting functionalities. While Varnish excels in caching and handling heavy traffic, Nginx offers more flexibility and a broader range of features. The choice between Varnish and Nginx ultimately depends on specific requirements and the intended use case of the web server.

Advice on NGINX and Varnish

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 649.6K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 618.3K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of NGINX
Pros of Varnish
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 893
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 288
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 225
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
  • 104
    High-performance
  • 67
    Very Fast
  • 57
    Very Stable
  • 44
    Very Robust
  • 37
    HTTP reverse proxy
  • 21
    Open Source
  • 18
    Web application accelerator
  • 11
    Easy to config
  • 5
    Widely Used
  • 4
    Great community
  • 2
    Essential software for HTTP

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of NGINX
Cons of Varnish
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
    Be the first to leave a con

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions