InVision vs UXPin: What are the differences?

1. Collaboration Features: InVision offers better collaboration features with real-time commenting and feedback options. It allows designers and stakeholders to work together seamlessly, reducing the need for constant back and forth communication. On the other hand, UXPin also has collaboration features, but they are not as robust and intuitive as InVision's.

2. Prototyping Capabilities: When it comes to prototyping, UXPin provides a more sophisticated and advanced prototyping tool compared to InVision. UXPin allows for more complex interactions and animations, making it a preferred choice for designers looking to create high-fidelity prototypes with intricate interactions.

3. Design Systems Support: InVision has a more robust design systems support with features like design asset libraries and shared component libraries. It allows designers to create and maintain a centralized repository of design assets that can be used across multiple projects. UXPin also supports design systems, but the implementation is not as seamless as in InVision.

4. Code Output: UXPin provides better code output options for developers, allowing them to extract clean and organized front-end code directly from the designs. This feature is particularly useful for ensuring design consistency and streamlining the handoff process between designers and developers. In contrast, InVision's code output options are limited, making it less developer-friendly.

5. Integration Ecosystem: InVision has a larger integration ecosystem with various third-party plugins and integrations with popular design tools like Sketch and Adobe XD. This makes it easier for designers to streamline their workflow and incorporate their favorite tools seamlessly. While UXPin also offers integrations, the options are more limited compared to InVision.

6. Learning Curve: When it comes to the learning curve, InVision is generally considered more user-friendly and easier to pick up for beginners. Its interface is intuitive, making it easier for designers to get started with creating prototypes and sharing designs. On the other hand, UXPin has a steeper learning curve due to its more advanced features and capabilities, which may require more time and effort to master.

In Summary, InVision excels in collaboration features, while UXPin stands out in prototyping capabilities and code output, making them suitable for different design needs and preferences.